Cookies Policy

We use cookies to ensure we give you the best experience on our site. If you continue without changing your settings, we assume you're happy to receive all cookies on this site. If you would like to, you can manually change your cookie settings at any time.


News & Knowledge

USA: The Defend Trade Secrets Act – How it might affect you

11th May 2016
Mitch Weinstein, Levenfeld Pearlstein LLC

On 11 May 2016, President Obama signed into law the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). This article by MSI's Illinois law member Levenfeld Pearlstein LLC explains the DTSA and what it means to you.

Mitch Weinstein of  Levenfeld Pearlstein’s IP group provides an explanation of the new act. What is the DTSA and what does this mean to you:

  • The new Defend Trade Secrets Act amends the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 and provides a new federal cause of action for trade secret misappropriation. It does not displace state trade secret misappropriation laws, rather it coexists with existing state laws, and provides an additional enforcement venue for civil suits within the federal court system
  • The DTSA provides remedies including injunctions and damages and, in certain extraordinary circumstances, it provides for civil seizure of property to prevent the use or dissemination of a misappropriated trade secret
  • If you are in a position to bring a trade secret misappropriation law suit, you should still consider whether to bring the action in state or federal court, depending on whether your state’s laws provide more protection, more favorable discovery and motion practice, and greater damages
  • Federal courts can award damages for actual loss, unjust enrichment or a reasonable royalty for the unauthorized disclosure or use of a trade secret. For willful and malicious misappropriation, courts can award triple damages and reasonable attorney’s fees. And, if a claim of misappropriation is made in bad faith, reasonable attorney’s fees can be awarded to the prevailing party
  • Last, the DTSA includes a safe harbor provision for whistleblowers. Whistleblowers are granted both civil and criminal immunity for disclosing a trade secret in confidence to a government official, or an attorney, when that disclosure is made solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law. The safe harbor provision can also be used to protect against a limited disclosure of trade secrets when an employee files a retaliation claim

Keep in mind that employee is defined very broadly in the DTSA and includes “any individual performing work as a contractor or consultant for an employer.” A notice that immunity for the use of trade secret information in an anti-retaliation lawsuit must be included in any contract or agreement that governs the use of trade secrets and other confidential information. This would cover, for example, non-disclosure or confidential disclosure agreements. Failure to comply with the notice requirement doesn’t foreclose a federal lawsuit, but will result in the employer losing the ability to recover enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees.

So, employers should consider reviewing and updating policy statements and agreements, as appropriate, to make sure the law’s safe harbor provisions are reflected in those documents.

Watch the video: Mitch Weinstein explains the Defend Trade Secrets Act

About Levenfeld Pearlstein LLC - Chicago

Chicago-based Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC provides legal and business counsel to sophisticated clients across a broad range of corporate, tax, estate planning, real estate, and litigation matters.

View firm profile